Skip to content
Monday, October 12, 2026
London Wildlife Trust

The Worst Titles of 2025, According to Review Aggregator Metacritic

At every turn, enthusiasts are foaming at the mouth to post their selections of the greatest games of 2025. Yet, where are the flops, the underperformers? It's time to take a few moments to honor the lowest-rated games of the year, as determined by review aggregator Metacritic. Could each of these games truly as terrible as the reviews suggest? Let's find out.

10. Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour

Metascore: 54/100, Audience Score: 3.4/10

Initial reactions to this showcase title were colored by its $9.99 price tag, with many expressing disappointment it wasn't a bundled game like some other console launches. Critical opinion varied dramatically, from "crushing disappointment" to somewhat forgiving appraisals that noted the delightful software underneath the controversy. In spite of the grumbling, the title proved to be a strong commercial performer during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Aggregate Score: 53/100, Audience Score: 3.2/10

Presented as "beyond a racing game," this simulation from Competition Company and Teyon received largely negative reviews. Reviews pointed out that the game fell short in almost every category, notably in a year packed with high-quality racing games. In the eyes of critics, this disappointing sim was best left unplayed.

8. Bubsy in: The Purrfect Collection

Metascore: 53/100, Audience Score: 8.6/10

First things first: the confusing colon usage is a minor strike against it. This anthology of retro mascot platformers features a sarcastic feline known for incessant hacky one-liners. The consensus was that these games were not good to begin with and haven't gotten better with age. The improbably high user score is a peculiar contrast to the Metascore.

7. Nen x Impact

Aggregate Score: 53, Audience Score: 3.5

This manga-based fighting game encountered harsh criticism from both professionals and the dedicated community. Issues included a thin character selection and a severe lack of content. Fan reaction was particularly harsh, with some stating a desire that the title's flop would have consequences for similar releases.

6. Riders Vs Dogoos

Metascore: 51, User Score: 5.3

A part of the anime-style Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this bike-riding title tasks players with gathering Dogoos. Critics argued that its goal to channel a *Katamari Damacy*-like gameplay loop didn't land, coming across as more of a cash grab than a meaningful Neptunia game. Its 3-hour duration combined with a full retail cost raised eyebrows.

5. Captain Blood

Metascore: 50, Audience Score: 5.3

This title is a resurrected relic from the Xbox era, launched after a very long time in production delays. The team behind it consciously chose to preserve the game as an original product of its time, accepting that contemporary players might dislike its retro feel. As such, many reviews concluded that the tale of its journey was far richer than the game itself.

4. Salvation

Metascore: 44, Audience Score: 2.4

This anime-styled third-person shooter inspired by games like *Returnal* disappointed with critics. Frequent criticisms centered on bland enemy design, monotonous stage design, and a unengaging plot. A much-criticized system involving the protagonist's clothing was seen as adding nothing and detracted from the game's overall experience.

3. Ambulance Life

Aggregate Score: 44, Audience Score: 4.9

Recall the tense medical sims of the past, then strip away the memorable characters. That, according to reviews, is essentially *Ambulance Life*. Critics found the emergency response sections to be tedious and repetitive, and the treatment of its subject matter was criticized as being poorly executed. The overall experience was deemed a missed opportunity.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Metascore: 43, User Score: 5.8

This shift away from the classic virtual pet formula transforms the franchise into a shopping simulation title. The result, based on critics, was a unsatisfying series of repetitive tasks that very soon became boring. Some reviews went so far as to label it one of the lowest-quality titles available on its platform, citing a dearth of satisfying gameplay.

1. MindsEye

Aggregate Score: 37, Audience Score: 2.5

Intended to be a blockbuster open-world action game from a studio led by experienced developers, *MindsEye* was a spectacular disappointment. Reviews heavily criticized its weak action, boring plot, and a plethora of technical problems. Many found it to be a significant step back compared to previous-generation games in the same genre. Among the overwhelming criticism, a tiny number of optimistic players found fun in the experience, serving as a lonely contrast.

RK
About the author

Robert Krause

Eleanor Greenway is a passionate conservationist and writer, dedicated to sharing stories about urban wildlife and environmental stewardship in London.

London Wildlife Trust

Type to search articles.